Limited Span of Attention Given

Gun violence, especially a mass shooting, is quickly attributed to violence in media, particularly video games, by politicians.

Since the logic of those political figures seems to be if something violent happens then it must be the result of something the perpetrator witnessed in a form of media, then why is that same logic not applied to sexual misconduct and sexual exploitation in media? Why does pornography get a free pass after every new report of influential people committing sexual atrocities?

From teachers and parents to celebrities of every sort, I’ve never seen an angry Republican or Democrat stand over a pulpit and vehemently point the finger at the pornographic material being to blame for a person’s sexual assault, no matter their age. 

The analogy seems to be clear: if violence in media leads to violent behavior, then sexual misconduct in media leads to sexual misconduct. No, I don’t have any figures to back that up, statistically, however, as a layperson who watches and reads the news, I have yet to see or read any account of influential people blaming pornography or pornographic material for the recent myriad of sexual crimes.

I expect those who supposedly have moral standards in the political sphere to at least take a look at the correlation, with the same scrutiny that’s been used to blame video games for gun violence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Broke Dick's Thoughts Bucket

Bard (Gemini) AI Regret Poetry

The Dick Who Was